The 2026 picture: visa economics have hardened the case for hiring in India
Since this article was first published, the trends it described have accelerated sharply. The United States raised the cost of new H-1B petitions to USD 100,000 from late September 2025 and reweighted selection towards higher-paid roles — a structural change, not a fee tweak. Tariff measures on Indian goods have persisted through trade negotiations. The combined effect on workforce strategy has been unambiguous: rather than moving Indian talent to the work, global companies are moving the work to Indian talent.
The clearest evidence is the boom in global capability centres (GCCs). India now hosts well over a thousand GCCs employing millions of professionals, with dozens of new American-headquartered centres launched in 2025 alone and industry projections pointing to continued double-digit growth through 2026 and beyond. For roles that once justified a visa petition, the comparison now looks different: one year of the new H-1B fee alone exceeds the fully loaded annual cost of many senior technology hires in India.
Three routes into the Indian workforce — compared for 2026
The strategic question has shifted from "should we build in India" to "through which vehicle". The three realistic options:
| Factor | Employer of Record (EOR) | Own entity / GCC | Independent contractors |
| Time to first hire | Days to weeks | Months (incorporation, registrations, bank accounts) | Days |
| Upfront investment | None beyond service fees | Significant — entity setup, premises, leadership | None |
| Compliance ownership | Carried by the EOR as legal employer | Fully yours, across central and state law | Nominally none — but misclassification risk sits with you |
| Suits | Testing the market, teams from 1 to ~50, speed-critical hiring | Long-term scale, IP-heavy operations, 100+ headcount | Short, genuinely independent engagements only |
| Exit complexity | Low — contractual | High — entity wind-down | Low, unless reclassified as employment |
Many companies sequence these: enter through an EOR in India, validate the team and market, then graduate to their own entity once headcount justifies it — often transferring the EOR-employed team into the new entity with service continuity preserved. The contractor route deserves the most caution: India's enforcement climate around misclassification has tightened, and disguised employment converts saved costs into back-dated liability.
The regulatory baseline has changed too: the Labour Codes
Foreign employers evaluating India in 2026 face a materially different — and in most respects simpler — regulatory frame than the one this article originally described. India's four Labour Codes came into force on 21 November 2025, consolidating 29 legacy statutes. For a foreign employer the practical implications are threefold: written appointment letters are mandatory for every employee; the statutory definition of wages requires basic pay to form at least half of total remuneration, which shapes how offers should be structured from day one; and fixed-term employment is now a recognised category with benefit parity, useful for project-based market entry. State-level rules are still being finalised through 2026, so multi-state operations need location-wise tracking — all data on which is verified and date-stamped by the TMS compliance team. A partner handling statutory compliance end-to-end absorbs this complexity so the market-entry decision does not stall on regulatory uncertainty.
Frequently asked questions
How do the H-1B changes affect hiring strategy for India?
The USD 100,000 petition cost and wage-weighted selection make relocating mid-level Indian talent to the US economically unviable for most roles. The rational response, visible across 2025–26, is to keep those roles in India — via an EOR for speed or a GCC for scale — and reserve visa spend for genuinely US-critical positions.
Is an EOR still the fastest way to do business in India?
Yes. An EOR remains the only route that produces compliant Indian employees within days, with no entity, no registrations and no capital commitment. It also de-risks the decision: if the market test fails, exit is contractual rather than a corporate wind-down.
Should we set up a GCC or use an EOR first?
Headcount and horizon decide it. Below roughly fifty employees, or where the India plan is still being validated, EOR economics and flexibility usually win. A GCC pays off with committed scale, dedicated leadership and IP that must sit inside your own entity. Starting on EOR and migrating the team into a later GCC is a well-trodden path.
Do India's new labour codes make hiring harder for foreign companies?
On balance, no. Consolidation of 29 laws into four codes simplifies the framework, and formal recognition of fixed-term employment adds flexibility. The genuine new obligations — mandatory appointment letters and the reweighted wages definition — are absorbed automatically when hiring through an EOR that structures offers compliantly from the outset.
Evaluating India entry against the new tariff, visa and regulatory landscape? Talk to the TMS EOR team for a country-entry briefing and a costed hiring plan within 48 hours.